Strange E-Mail, Illegal Surveillance
On February 14, 2006, I received a copy of a mysterious e-mail which was forged with my address as if it were sent from this computer and sent to the Department of Justice with the title "Propaganda Crimes" which, if I remember correctly, also had a link to one of my posts. While for some strange reason that particular e-mail didn't turn up on my computer, I did manage to find the response to my heads up to the DOJ:
Dear Department of Justice,
Obviously someone has forged my e-mail and sent you a message. I have not sent any correspondence to the Department of Justice whatsoever. In view of this situation, I would appreciate a copy of the e-mail which was wrongly attributed to me as the source of it's origin.
Blessings,
In a message dated 2/14/2006 10:03:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov writes:
Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This is an automatic acknowledgment that your e-mail was received. It will be reviewed in the order it was received.=But I never heard anything more about it.
My post that was evidently forwarded to the Department of Justice, about which I saved a copy, would have been the following, which had appeared on UnknownCountry.com shortly before the mysterious e-mail was received:
Post:
Things have changed a whole lot in the last 15-20 years. The government used to have a lot more control on information sources, The NSA censors Universities, the media can be purchased for a price, as we see has happened recently, and access to foreign publications was once quite costly. The Internet made all kinds of information available to everyone. In it's way, it's the epitome of a free press, everyone gets to be heard. But since the government had little control over the net as an important source of global information, it had then to resort to nefarious means, such as online bullying, disinformation, propaganda and even covert ops involving hacking and infecting of computers whose use is somehow deemed objectionable to the Neocon Administration and therefore to be treated as a risk to "national security".
It was the only way, short of closing down the Internet, that they could still control this vital source of information. While they couldn't stop the masses from speaking freely, they could confuse everyone with enough propaganda and lies as to prevent a massive outcry about any issue, as it has long been the case concerning UFO phenomena, and now about the Neocons. It's a typically fascist move. The Nazi's knew better than anyone that knowledge is power, and they then sought to have it all for themselves and none left for anyone else. Propaganda is the first step. After that they look to find excuses to say that the public is just too irresponsible to have a free press, usually citing concerns over pornography, or, I believe, much as they intend to say that a few cartoons were the reason for the recent spate of violence, ignoring that theses people have a lot of much more important axes to grind. It's really a subversive attack on free media, "Look! See, censorship IS needed!". The question I have is who paid the Danes to run these inflammatory cartoons. Probably the same economic hitmen who go around telling world leaders they can be rich, or they can be dead, take your pick. Then they just spin the situation for effect. That's what people don't get, unlimited money can buy anything, and sociopaths can use anything to manipulate public opinion. Money is no object to those with a limitless supply. It's sort of a worldwide protection racket, they create problems and then offer their own answers to the problems they've created.
(End post)
One can only imagine what they were trying to tell me by forging my e-mail.
Surveillance abuses are only starting to come to light, as we can see from the following article that states that the FBI alone may have broken the law over 1,000 times:
See what's free at AOL.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment