Friday, September 28, 2007

Limbaugh Opens Mouth Inserts Both Feet

Blatant Hypocrisy:

Butt Kissers Get Support, Soldiers Get Kiss Off

The hypocrisy of the government has never been more apparent than it is right now, today. While even democrats condemn a liberal blog for it's criticism of someone who is clearly just another brass propagandist for the Bush war crimes conspirators, one of their favorite GOP shills denounces battlefield veterans who have actually spent time in combat in these wars as "phonies". These same people didn't denounce criticism of a veteran who gave half of his body for this country.  In other words, the only way someone earns the right to speak freely in America is to kiss Bush's backside, according to the GOP and their democrat lackeys. Now lets see how many of these people really support our troops, and how many of them are simply supporting the people getting them killed every single day in these illegal and immoral wars. And for reasons of their very own. 

 
If impeachment is still off the table, it better be because they're going to skip the formalities and take these criminals straight to jail. And does anyone need another war president, republican or democrat? Just what are these people thinking? Clearly they've lost touch with reality somewhere along the line. Believe it or not, politicians, the majority still matters in this country, no matter what you think of it.
 
For more on the War on Drugs pillhead Limbaugh's hypocrisy and insult to our troops:
 
 
And tell the Executive branch that they can keep their stupid chemtrails, we've seen them before.
 

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

House Joins Senate in Condemning Free Speech

House Joins Senate in Condemning Free Speech
 
"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." 
 American Proverb
 
One as to wonder how it is that these supposed representatives of our people manage to so absolutely ignore the people whom they are supposed to represent. More than anything it's beginning to look like a class war, the rich just do whatever they want to do and tell the rest of us to shut up. Congress must be so tired of having their approval ratings reach historic lows that soon they'll only allow us to say whatever it is that they want to hear. Where was the outrage about the Swift Boat campaign, or the outrage over Petraeus wearing a medal which he didn't earn?
 
Wake up America, the millionaires club which is your government isn't about you. It isn't about what you want or what you need. It's all about them, now. Your Constitution and Bill of Rights is now for rich people, not for us nobodies. Not for the people who are dieing in a war which America has no legal, ethical nor moral right to wage. And rather than talk about the war, they simply pull out that tired old tactic of talking about talking about the war.
 
If you don't get it Congress, I'll enlighten you. You're supposed to listen to the people you represent. You're not supposed to be telling them to sit down and shut up.  Maybe next you'll be condemning free speech altogether. Keep this up and you'll be the first Congress in our history to have a zero percent approval rating. Not that it would mean much to you. Apparently you're serving more than one master. It's very difficult to say how it is that anything you're doing right now is serving the people of this nation or any other portion of humanity for that matter. If you want this war you should fight it yourselves and pay for it out of your own pockets.
 
Paul J. Norton, American citizen. I said it. Pass a resolution condemning me for my opinion? In my house growing up we had a saying. "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Add that on to your condemnation of free speech why don't you?

Friday, September 21, 2007

Congress Condemns Constitutional Freedom

Congress Votes to Condemn Constitutionally Protected Free Speech at MoveOn. Org 

 

Since I've been back chemtrails have returned to Yreka. Nothing like a little street cred to make you feel relevant.

Like so many other people I am shocked and dismayed at the actions of Congress, that they would formally condemn and act of free speech. Just when you think that you've heard and seen so much that nothing could shock you anymore, something does. An assault on free speech by the very people whose job it is to protect the Constitution of the United States of America is so hypocritical that it would shock any reasonable person. But I suppose that at the end of the day, the same people who have given Congress an 11% approval rating will simply consider the source. Essentially, with this sort of stunt Congress had it's head in the toilet and for reasons unknown simply decided to flush. Those reasons are what are most worrisome.
 
Perhaps the Democrats who voted to condemn free speech were still worried that the president might "accidentally" nuke the US, since he can "accidentally" lose nukes over the US. Perhaps they're worried that this president may go ahead with plans to terrorize still more innocent nations based on some lie or another, some unproven bit of "evidence", or wage war on some other person who will never get their day in court since Congress now thinks so little of habeas corpus that anyone may soon be guilty until they are unable to prove that they are innocent. Here I note that a very wise man once said that Justice would demand that the Devil himself receive a fair trial. That, of course, because justice is supposed to be blind to anything but a consideration of known facts in a case. Facts which can be proven in such a way that guilt is only assumed when proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
 
Despite all of this, America remains in Iraq when it simply has no right whatsoever to be there. Nothing about the reasons we supposedly went there panned out. So why are we still there? Here's an analogy worth thinking about; If the police are given a warrant because there is probable cause to search for illegal weapons in a home, and they don't find any, should they just move into the home since they're already there? How long should they remain there? Six months? A year? Until someone in the home can be trusted to make sure that this will never happen again? The right answer is that they should leave. Not tomorrow, not the day after, they would leave as soon as it has been established that no such crime had indeed occurred as the one for which there was probable cause to believe had been committed, per the warrant. Even if you found other criminal activities while you were there they couldn't be prosecuted in court because they weren't covered by the warrant. America has held to these standards of justice from time out of mind. But when did we, as Americans, begin to believe that only Americans are deserving of justice?
 
All of this is clearly why the international community is upset with America. Because they hold to very similar notions about justice, and don't believe that self professed police departments are above such matters of law as have become contractual agreements between nations including the Geneva convention, which America has clearly violated. In short, it's not ok just because America has done this, that would simply be nationalism, that would simply be "might makes right", two of Nazism's most famous calling cards.
 
We could argue after that the warrant sworn out for Iraq wasn't any good in the first place, but the immediate thing to consider is that the search turned up nothing. And we have no right to remain there whatsoever. We should be out of Iraq in 30 days. Even that just acknowledges that it takes a reasonable amount of time to do things, it's not like we even have a right to those thirty days, just that any reasonable person could see where an orderly departure would be safest for all concerned.
 
In the meantime, just as occurred during Vietnam, the republicans are sure to begin predicting a blood bath occurring in Iraq upon our departure which will no doubt throw our former friends there into such a state of panic that it could become a self fulfilling prophecy. None of that because the politicians have Iraqi interests in mind, but rather simply as an act of political desperation meant to salvage whatever they can from being the most failed American government in history.
 
For more interesting thoughts on the Congressional condemnation of free speech see:
 
 

Monday, September 17, 2007

MKULTRA: The Death of Caring

Hello Everyone,
 
Three weeks ago I was writing an essay on Bohemian Grove, how the ceremony there involving the mock funeral of a child called "the Death of Caring" leads to the eventual death of conscience on the part of initiates to "high government" who will decide matters of life and death. It was perhaps the best piece of it's kind that I'd ever written. And just as I was finishing the story my computer rebooted, all by itself. The first time that ever happened. Of course I've had every sort of problem with the government, am under constant illegal surveillance, and have had no few hacker issues as well.
 
The story would have informed everyone that the meeting at Bohemian Grove for new initiates into "high government" are told to consider things very carefully. That for example, if they care too much about the children lost to MKULTRA, they may care more if even more children are lost in wars. That if they care too much, say, about the disease of poverty, perhaps they will care more about some other disease, which may make it's way into their gated communities. Such initiates are then informed in a variety of subtle and not so subtle ways that they could have real problems with the most dangerous people on the planet. "What's in *your* drink?", spoken rhetorically with a smirk.
 
And quite possibly, if someone drinks too much while at the event, or has their drink spiked, or simply succumbs to a number of death threats, may under duress participate in some illicit act which would allow the intelligence community to blackmail them whenever they so wish. I believe that this is what happened to Hunter Thompson, who apparently committed suicide after being exposed when the Franklin scandal broke for having participated in a crime while at Bohemian Grove.
 
Well, that's what the essay would have told you if it had not been lost during a reboot that occurred for no apparent reason. I was just so involved with writing it, and it was written too quickly for me to have saved my work as I went along. But the only way those reboots happen are online, and not for any good reason to be sure. All that being said I sort of lost my itch for writing for awhile because I knew that I couldn't have replaced the work. Sometime you just know when you've topped yourself. After that I sort of suffered from a dazed writer's block. Not that I didn't think my efforts here worth the trouble, just that I couldn't bear to try to rewrite the article that I was just sure was one of my personal best. Meanwhile, Congress went on vacation, the alternative press was alive with very important stories, and I decided that I could use a little time off to catch up with family matters and with my housework. Well, I caught up with family matters, the house is still a mess.
 
When I first started Freedom of Thought I knew that I had an incredible and insightful story but one that was going to be very difficult to tell because it was so long and involved and required so much explanation. Ordinarily, such stories require books for the telling, but this seemed like the better media for me. It was better because the story was so immediate, so timely to current affairs, whether or not anyone had realized it. Since I'm already disabled a book would have taken a very long time. And books are work. Too much work for someone like me. Having been posting to bulletin boards since 1989, I felt more comfortable with a format that was much more instantaneous anyway, and not merely relevant after the fact.
 
There was also this; It would be impossible for me to prove any of my sources, although the recent release of a lot of documentation supported my claims. And that having been a high scoring analyst who had paid a very high price for never having signed a disclosure agreement, and also for having announced my intentions to investigate MKULTRA for Congress which I was able to prove directly, I would have to rely on erudition, I would have to demonstrate my knowledge and expertise in the field. I hope my readers will agree that I have managed to do just that. More importantly, I thought, there might be any number of interested parties that might benefit from having an accurate analysis of current events as they were unfolding.
 
My Open Letter to Congress has undoubtedly already found it's way to the capitol, although it wouldn't hurt to resend it as a reminder, the reader is invited to send a copy at any time. But I haven't heard from Congress, it's not difficult to guess why. Essentially, everything has become about whether or not the people responsible for MKULTRA, still operating even though banned by Congress, and who are the same people responsible for any number of very serious crimes against this country, it's citizens, and people around the world... everything has become about whether or not the most dangerous people on the planet will be prosecuted for their crimes, or whether in this Orwellian age telling the truth itself will become criminal. 
 
I'm back for the time being, but much of my personal mission here has been accomplished. I told my story, demonstrated my knowledge, and declared my willingness to testify to Congress under oath. Events will determine everything else eventually.
 
Thanks to everyone for continuing to take an interest in Freedom of Thought. I'll still be making entries into this journal, please forgive me if sometimes I fall behind a little. After all, I am permanently disabled due to my experience with MKULTRA.
 
Best,
Paul