Monday, April 21, 2008

Nazis Love the GOP

GOP Candidate Celebrates Hitler's Birthday
 
The world is a place that only gets curiouser and curiouser. An article appeared at Raw Story about a fringe GOP candidate who celebrated Hitler's birthday with Neo-Nazis. The GOP were quick to distance themselves from the republican candidate:
 
From the Raw Story article:
 
"I cannot believe that in 2008 anyone could think so backwards," Luke Puckett, another GOP candidate for 2nd District congressman, said in reaction to Zirkle’s comment.

“The ‘R’ next to Tony Zirkle’s name does not stand for Republican. It stands for ‘repulsive,'" Chris Riley, chairman of the St. Joseph County Republican Party, told WSBT-TV. "The Republican Party stands for two basic principles: individual freedom and government accountability. Nazi socialism and fascism is the polar opposite of those two principles so for him to align himself with this puts him at the opposite end of the political spectrum from Republicans. And the visual images of Tony Zirkle standing in front of a Nazi flag are nauseating and repulsive."
 
Alright, so the GOP mainstream claims that they don't like Nazis. The real question which remains then is why do Nazis quite obviously like the GOP?
 
Full article:
 

Monday, April 14, 2008

9/11 and the Bush Nazi Conspiracy

Great article by the Existentialist Cowboy on the parallels between the rise of Nazi Germany and what has happened under the Bush administration. False flag operations are a documented staple of CIA tactics. By now the Nazi connections to all of this should be obvious to anyone. People everywhere are finally waking up to precisely what is being said here:
 
Bush's Conspiracy to Create an American Police State: Part I, Police States Begin With False Flag Attacks

It was David Hume’s 1758 Of the First Principles of Government that stated:

Nothing appears more surprising to those who consider human affairs with a philosophical eye than the easiness with which the many are governed by the few, and the implicit submission with which men resign their own sentiments and passions to those of their rulers.

When we inquire by what means this wonder is effected, we shall find that, as force is always on the side of the governed, the governors have nothing to support them but opinion. It is, therefore, on opinion only that government is founded, and this maxim extends to the most despotic and most military governments as well as to the most free and most popular.

—David Hume, Of the First Principles of Government

Hume was not alone in associating military governments with despotic governments. When any person puts himself both above and against the law, then the people are entitled lawfully to rise up —violently if necessary —to overthrow the tyrant, the self-proclaimed dictator. In our own Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson said that "...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it". Che Guevara spoke of such 'governments' when he said:

When the forces of oppression come to maintain themselves in power against established law, peace is considered already broken

Che Guevara, Chapter I: General Principles of Guerrilla Warfare

John Dean makes this chilling point. Nixon, at the height of the Watergate scandal, toyed with the idea of defying the high court, but, in the end thought better of it and resigned. Bush/Cheney won't budge amid declarations that whatever may be alleged against them, they can, themselves "authorize" it and make it legal –even after the fact. This is, of course, utter (redacted for AOL), a violation of the Constitutional prohibition of ex post facto laws1. But powerful men with nukes and paid thugs believe it.
 
 
Full Article: